APIndiana News

Federal judge hearing arguments over Indiana’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors

FILE - Protesters stand outside of the Senate chamber at the Indiana Statehouse on Feb. 22, 2023, in Indianapolis. A federal judge is scheduled Wednesday, June 14, to hear arguments in a lawsuit seeking to block an Indiana law banning doctors from providing puberty blockers, hormones and gender-affirming surgeries to minors. (AP Photo/Darron Cummings, File)

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — A federal judge is scheduled Wednesday to hear arguments in a lawsuit seeking to block an Indiana law banning doctors from providing puberty blockers, hormones and gender-affirming surgeries to minors.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana has asked the judge in Indianapolis for a preliminary injunction that would stop the law from taking effect July 1. The group filed its lawsuit on behalf of four transgender youth and an Indiana doctor who provides transgender medical treatment just hours after Republican Gov. Eric Holcomb signed the bill April 5.

The organization argues the ban violates the U.S. Constitution’s equal protection guarantees, federal laws regarding essential medical services and wrongly prohibits Indiana doctors from communicating with out-of-state doctors about gender-affirming care for their patients younger than 18.

Indiana’s ban was enacted amid a national push by Republican-led legislatures continue to curb LGBTQ+ rights. At least 20 states have now enacted laws restricting or banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors after Missouri’s governor signed that state’s bill into law last week.

Indiana’s Republican-dominated Legislature approved the ban this spring after contentious hearings that primarily featured testimony from vocal opponents, with many arguing the gender-affirming care lessened the risk of depression and suicide among transgender youth. Bill sponsor Republican Rep. Joanna King of Middlebury said the ban would “protect our children from irreversible, harmful, life-altering procedures.”

The ACLU countered in court filings that the Indiana ban “is extraordinary in its overreach.”

“The care that it bans is not untested or experimental treatment. It is the consensus medical treatment endorsed by major medical professional associations across the globe,” the group said. “Yet, Indiana presumes to intrude into the relationship between parents, their children, and their physicians to absolutely prohibit this essential treatment.”

Republican state Attorney General Todd Rokita, whose office is defending the law, has praised the ban against what he calls “irreversible and damaging decisions.”

“Banning these experimental procedures is critical for the health and wellbeing of future generations,” Rokita said.

Lawsuits have been filed in several states against transgender treatment bans. Federal judges have blocked enforcement of laws in Alabama and Arkansas, and Oklahoma has agreed to not enforce its ban while opponents seek a temporary court order blocking it.

The Indiana law would immediately ban gender-affirming surgeries while trans youth currently taking medication to transition would have until the end of the year to stop doing so. Doctors who violate the ban could be disciplined by the state medical licensing board.

The case is being heard by U.S. District Court Judge James Patrick Hanlon, a former President Donald Trump appointee, who in 2021 issued an order blocking an Indiana law that would have required doctors to tell women undergoing drug-induced abortions about a disputed treatment for potentially stopping the abortion process.

Related posts

Brooks Bill Would Allow Moving Killer’s Remains

Kayla Blakeslee

DNA Match Leads to Charges in Indiana Woman’s 1998 Slaying

Tom Franklin

Restrictions Could be Lifted on Internet Wine Purchases

WOWO News

3 comments

Pat June 14, 2023 at 3:58 pm

The AP is all-in on the trans lunacy lies. There is no such thing as “gender-affirming care” for minor children. Adults can mutilate themselves if they so choose, but children are not wise enough, nor mature enough to make such decisions. This “care,” of which the ACLU and the Associated Press speak, is nothing more than child abuse, and the legislature is absolutely correct to slam on the brakes on such evil doings.

Reply
C. Ommon Sense June 15, 2023 at 7:54 am

I agree with you Pat. Let’s not forget that this is a giant distraction from inflation, high energy prices, and an open border. Biden and the Dems are happy the trans fascists are hogging the news cycle on a daily basis. I truly believe most Americans don’t give a second thought to the trans movement and are more worried about being able to live their lives without the government trying to force acceptance of people who need mental help, not affirmation, hormones, and surgery.

Reply
Slacker06 June 15, 2023 at 8:53 am

What the pushers of this sickness don;t tell the parents or kids getting the drugs or surgery are the downsides. Like with the Covid “vaccine” scam there are side effects that follow the victim through out life. Not to mention the high percentage of suicides with those who pretend to be other than what they were born. They end up finding out that what they have don doesn’t make them happy and great depression sets in. Informed consent is gone in our medical system. The People will consequently be hoodwinked into “treatments” that make the doctors a lot of money but destroy the lives they practice on. Remember, medical care is a “PRACTICE.” The ACLU is not our friend, it is the enemy of LIBERTY even thou they use that word in their title. Kalifornia is in the process of passing a law that will hold parents liable for child abuse if they refuse any transitioning of their kids. At a hearing the lone republican senator urged parents to MOVE AWAY FROM KALIFORNIA. Sounds lik good advice for any parent that truly loves their children.

Reply

Leave a Comment