Indiana News

Gun Bill Debate On-Going At Indiana Statehouse

Photo Supplied / Indiana Statehouse

INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. (NETWORK INDIANA):  A bill that would prevent from local governments from suing gun manufacturers could be voted on this week in the House Floor. This bill says only the state can sue a gun manufacturer. It was approved in the House Judiciary Committee last week by a vote of 8-2.

One person who testified in favor of the bill was Indiana Gun Rights Attorney Guy Relford.

“It doesn’t can’t say there can’t ever be such a lawsuit. It just says it can’t be brought by a local government. The state or the Attorney General’s Office could still file that lawsuit on behalf of a local government. It just takes local politics out of it,” said Relford.

The bill would also apply retroactively to ongoing litigation. That means it applies to a 1999 lawsuit involving the City of Gary. In August 1999, the City of Gary — with the assistance of Brady attorneys and Michael Tolbert of Tolbert & Tolbert, LLC — brought a lawsuit against major gun manufacturers such as Smith & Wesson, Beretta USA Corp, Glock, and Hi-Point, as well as major sellers of crime guns in and around the City, for what the attorneys called their “complicity in contributing to the public safety risk caused by the availability of cheap firearms.”

“This case that the City of Gary brought has been really stymied by a lot of attempts by the gun industry to evade accountability,” said Kelly Sampson, Brady’s Senior Counsel and Director of Racial Justice.

Sampson argues that local municipalities, like Gary, should have the right to bring lawsuits in an attempt to hold an industry accountable for harming it’s people.

“If you don’t follow responsible business practices when getting a firearm, when you ignore signs that the gun will be used in a crime, and something happens with that gun over and over again, then you have to have responsibility for your actions,” said Sampson.

In June, Lake Superior judge John Sedia issued a ruling allowing the discovery process to go ahead. That is where parties to a case can produce and share relative documents, such as gun sales by local retailers, for example.

Relford argues that the Brady attorneys don’t want to take the case to trial.

“They’re just using this as a means to discover information from the firearm industry in an attempt to beat them up,” said Relford.

He says privacy was what drove the thought process behind this bill.

“Now suddenly, my name’s been disclosed. What gun I’ve bought is disclosed. That’s all in the public domain. A lot of people are upset about that going, ‘Hey. It’s nobody’s business but mine what firearms I own or what firearms I bought,” said Relford.

Sampson says it’s very concerning that if the bill passes, then the power of local municipalities and governments will be lost.

“If your local officials thought it was in your best interest to bring this sort of case to protect your, your family, and your neighbors, they would no longer be able to do so even if they have that power for other industries,” said Sampson.

The lawsuit first brought by the City of Gary was against 11 handgun manufacturers, one wholesaler, five retailers, and additional “John Doe” defendants in 1999. It’s due for discovery in February. The city claims that negligent marketing and deceptive advertising by the businesses constituted a public nuisance and fueled illegal trafficking of weapons and violent crime in Gary.

Relford says questions gun stores must ask their customers are prescribed by federal law. The questions are dictated to gun stores by the ATF.

“The person fills that form out in the gun store. It asks questions like ‘Have you committed a crime for which you’ve been sentenced to prison longer than a year?’, ‘Are you under a domestic violence order of protection?’, ‘Are you in the country illegally?’ etc.,” said Relford.

By law that form gets sent to a national background check system in the FBI.

Related posts

Nationwide health study puts Indiana in bottom ten

WOWO News

Biden to visit Indianapolis Friday

WOWO News

Hospital Closely Monitoring Staff Amid MERS Case

Kayla Blakeslee

2 comments

Slcker06 January 22, 2024 at 9:27 am

It continues to baffle me that so many people fail to hold those responsible for violence with guns, the human that animates an inanimate object. It could be a knife, a brick, a chunk of concrete, a vehicle, or a very long list of things used to kill or harm others. Federal crime statistics show that hands and feet are used more often that ALL LONG GUNS. That “all long guns” category includes the hated AR or AK type rifles the gun banners seem to be overly passionate about. Despite the hyperbolic news reporting AR and AK style rifles are used in so few crimes they do not have their own category in the statistics.

All these implements of death can also be used to defend one. They are all inanimate objects. They need a human to animate them. The human element is NEVER ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED. Have you ever seen a murder case where the firearm or other implement was on trial. NOPE it is always a human on trial for his deeds.

The firearms industry is the most regulated sector of our economy. It need to remain vibrant because we never know when our military will need additional millions of rifles and pistols to fend off an enemy nation.

Our founders suffered through a time in history when the King wanted his troops or forces to be the only ones armed. They ran roughshod over the common man. Hence we have the 2nd Amendment that guarantees a pre-existing God given right to the means of self preservation or preservation of our communities or country. These days Calamity Joe Chaos threatens citizens with F-16s of they do not obey his diktats.

If you do not like guns the leave them alone. Just do not come crying to me when a criminal with a gun accosts you or kills a member of your family. Those thugs NEVER obey the gun laws anyway so no law will stop them except putting them behind bars for a very long time. none of those 15 year old gang members shooting up your neighborhood obtained their weapon legally. There are no illegal guns, only illegal gun owners/carriers. Stop being ignorant.

Reply
John January 22, 2024 at 10:07 am

I urge Every gun owner to contact their Indiana legislative representative & strongly – but politely – share their opinion/thoughts regarding this proposed legislation.

Reply

Leave a Comment