Indiana News

Ind. High Court Rules in Evidence Testimony Case

INDIANAPOLIS (AP): The Indiana Supreme Court has ruled that criminal defendants aren't entitled to question in court every person who handled evidence used against them.
Scott Speers was convicted of burglary and sentenced to eight years in prison for stealing guns from a Martinsville gun shop.   The 36-year-old argued on appeal that his right of confrontation was violated because the state failed to present for cross-examination a lab technician who transferred blood evidence from broken glass onto a swab for DNA testing.
Speers maintained that the blood transfer was a “crucial step” in the evidence-gathering process.
But the state Supreme Court unanimously rejected that claim. Justice Robert Rucker wrote that it's up to prosecutors to decide which steps in the evidence chain require testimony.

Related posts

Bill that would ban abortions based on fetal abnormalities signed by Pence

AP News

National Anti-Drug Conference Taking Place in Indianapolis This Week

Tom Franklin

Fort Wayne ranked 135th healthiest city nationwide

Brooklyne Beatty